Tag Archives: coaching

Remembering Yabby

As published by Australian Football, 13 July 2012

Allan Jeans sadly passed away a year ago today. Few journalists extracted much joy from ‘Yabby’ over his long career, thus preserving his mysterious aura.  Five years ago I was lucky enough to gain an insight into the five-time Premiership coach and his football philosophies.  

In his modest Cheltenham home, Jeans at 74 still exuded an undeniable presence.  My first mistake was saying ‘yes’ to sugar in my coffee – he took great delight equating my likeness for sweetness to weakness.  But Jeans had mellowed enough to make one feel welcome and worthy of his time – you just had to be ‘on’.

For anyone with a pulse, Allan Jeans’ motivational speeches, both as a coach and in later years as a guest speaker, possessed a power that always resonated.  Interestingly, it took a girl’s observation at a school clinic before he even realised how or why he modulated his voice so effectively.

“I suppose it might have been the trains at Hawthorn going past – every time you went in giving a serve to somebody or giving an instruction, a train would go past and you’d have to raise your voice”, mused Jeans.

Considering himself merely an ordinary person that happened to coach in a public arena, Jeans’ aversion for self promotion also had the tactical benefit of denying opponents any motivational material. 

“Usually if you’re prepared to say something different or ratty they like to come and listen” Jeans dryly quipped, in reference to the trend of coaches as club marketers. 

In an age of weasel words, spin and manufactured hype, Jeans’ strength of character and ability to cut through superfluous distractions to get to the nub of an issue were refreshing traits born of another era.  

Given the complex nature of modern football and the coach’s role, I asked Jeans what he made of the exhaustive selection process now in vogue.

“I think the first question you gotta ask any person is ‘what product are we selling as a professional football club?’  The product you’re selling is winning!  ‘Now tell me your philosophy on how to win a game of Australian Rules football because we’re buying that philosophy”. 

About now I could picture myself in the bowels of the MCG sitting alongside Dermie and Dipper preparing for the ’89 Grand Final, Yabby exhorting us to pay the price for the better pair of shoes.

“The formula for winning in League football is so simple it’s unbelievable!” boomed Jeans with a twinkle in his eye, prompting me for a response.

Unfortunately I was a rabbit caught in the headlights, for an incisive answer escaped me. 

“Money and players!” exclaimed Yabby, before suddenly realising it isn’t quite so simple these days. 

“You can’t really buy players now, but (if) you can hang onto players it’s so much easier.”

And that certainly is the great challenge facing clubs in the current environment.

After closely observing three coaches in five years at perennial easybeat St Kilda, at just 27 Jeans sensed his true calling.  Being a policeman with a mature sense of responsibility provided a leadership foundation, however it was the brothers Smith, Norm and Len, that guided Jeans through his early years.  At 33 Jeans famously took the Saints to football’s pinnacle.

When Jeans inherited a not-so happy team at Hawthorn in 1981, no-one envisaged the fantastic ride ahead.  Jeans’ assessment of the Hawk juggernaut is modest and pragmatic.

“No coach has won a premiership with poor players.  Hawthorn was very fortunate, they had a very good county zone and I got the benefit out of it.”

More than good fortune, Jeans’ ability to identify players’ weaknesses, extract their best and minimise the “natural phenomenon of undulating performance” were keys to his success. With Jeans at the helm, the perfect storm bore the ruthless, grounded, and highly disciplined Hawks of the ‘Eighties. 

“The only thing that alters is the bottom sides crack earlier if you put the same amount of pressure on them.” 

Jeans’ penchant for engaging the likes of Dipper in impromptu wrestling bouts were legendary, however a brain aneurysm in January 1988 nearly had him down for a full count. 

“I was lucky to get through it, I was very fortunate.  Dr Su, he was a brilliant neurosurgeon, he saved my life.  It was a very complicated operation.”

Speaking of physical challenges, it was about then, when the conversation turned to the contentious hands in the back rule, that Yabby jumped out of his chair to demonstrate the proper technique of holding one’s ground without infringing.  Never mind our age or size difference, Jeans was immovable within the confines of his small loungeroom!

After the major health scare, Jeans surprisingly returned to the director’s chair.  The lure of a great Hawthorn team was incentive enough, and Yabby simply loved coaching too much.  Having left the police force in 1987, Jeans also felt he needed to consolidate his family’s finances.  The ’89 flag vindicated Jeans’ perseverance, but after retiring at the end of 1990, many questioned how Graeme Richmond lured Jeans back for an ill-feted year at the Tigers in 1992.  

“When you’ve been in football any length of time you don’t like to see clubs struggling. If you feel like you can help them, if you like coaching…”

Before the conversation turned to his passion for lawn bowls, Jeans expressed his concern at structural issues facing the AFL, and the modern game’s aesthetics.

“Possession takes away the unpredictability and that’s what the coaches are trying to get, but it’s the unpredictability that keeps you so intense watching it, and that’s what you’ve got to try and keep going.” 

Amid a coach driven modern game, Jeans also empathised with the AFL’s task of maintaining its unique brand of organised chaos.   

“Can you describe our game?” 

Again I fumbled for a sharp response.  Thankfully that was Yabby’s point. 

“If you can’t describe something, how do you sell it?”

Allan Jeans the man wasn’t such a hard sell. Coaching 575 games over 26 years at a winning ratio of 62% was only half the story of a person who influenced so many lives within and beyond football.

@JeffDowsing, August 2007

Leave a Comment

Filed under Pigskin Ponderings

Lethal or Mick? A hypothetical

As published by the The Footy Almanac, 4 April 2012

If you flat out refuse to deal in hypotheticals, then by all means click the ‘back’ button now. Fair enough too, I’m not usually one for hypotheticals either, it’s a bit too Bruce McAvaney for my liking.

Actually Bruce, or more so his employer, lead me to my subject. Seven has certainly scored some kind of coup surrounding him with two absolute doyens of the game. For when it comes to the special comments gig, it would be nigh impossible to go past the insight that Leigh Matthews and Mick Malthouse’s combined tally of 1629 matches, 77 seasons and 12 flags at the highest level bring to the mike.

It was a bit like Mick Jagger meeting Paul McCartney at the beginning of last Friday night’s coverage, and the two respectfully greeted eachother as they probably did the 34 occasions they moved magnets on opposing clipboards. There appears to be no Sheedy – Walls frisson here.

As commentators, Lethal’s superbly pragmatic style mirrors his efficient, no-nonsense method as a player and coach. Meanwhile, Mick might tend towards the scenic, obscure path, but I guess it goes to his days as a wily back pocket which required a little more calculation than his colleague to get the job done.

For much of my life either Matthews or Malthouse have been steering the ship at Collingwood. Seeing them together led me to ponder which of the club’s two living premiership coaches I’d give the nod to if I was interviewing for the top job.

Both men succeeded at a club with a modern history of failing under an enormous weight of expectation.  Both also won multiple flags with non-Victorian teams (which had a bit more of a leg-up in assembling their premier combinations). The nature of Lethal and Mick’s kindred careers make for an interesting study.

Surprisingly, despite breaking two sizeable droughts, both are probably respected more as Collingwood coaches by the media and non-fans. Notwithstanding, had they delivered a second flag, I dare say their place in all black and white hearts would have been assured. 

Of course with such hypotheticals come hypothetical conditions. I’m not speculating in realistic terms if Bucks proved a disaster and the job was up for grabs next year. Matthews has been away from the coal face for a little long now.  So forget their respective ages, and taking into account Leigh’s considerable career with Brisbane and Mick’s at Footscray & West Coast, who would be the better appointment?

As much as anything, solving the riddle goes to how coaches are perrceived and rated, and just how many factors must come into play when clubs make the hand wringing decision. And what’s more, how does one realistically define success in AFL terms anyway?

 Exhibit A is Mick and Lethal’s tale of the tape;

Leigh Matthews
H & A:   250-7-177   @ 58.4%
Finals:      17-1-9      @ 64.8%
Grand Finals:   4-0-1   @ 80%

Mick Malthouse
H & A:   360-4-250   @ 58.9%
Finals:   26-2-22    @ 54%
Grand Finals:   3-1-4   @ 43.8%

Well they do say there’s damn lies and then there’s statistics. These figures alone glean very little.

Overall win-loss is virtually identical.  In finals Matthews leads 3-2 with one draw – hardly compelling. Overall head to head sees Lethal hold a 19-14 advantage though. Matthews also boasts an excellent strike rate in terms of flags to finals campaigns, but on the flipside there were a fair few Septembers with ample time for supporters to contemplate the gardening.

In terms of their similarly lengthy Magpie tenures, both found the club at its most dire.  Malthouse fared slightly worse; in the aftermath of last year’s decider he bluntly described Collingwood’s then status as ‘sixteenth, broke and shithouse’.  Matthews at least inherited a middling list of players.

Both righted the ship very quickly. Lethal took a mixed bag from 14th in 1987 to 2nd on the ladder before a straight sets exit in 1988, and then to the Promised Land in his fifth season. In Mick’s case, so meteroic was the rise in fortunes, the 2002-03 Grand Finals came about when his premiership clock had barely sent the kids off to bed. And but for a little luck the ‘Pies would have snatched the one they shouldn’t, whilst in the following one they might have, they froze. Mick’s last big dance saw circumstances conspire against one of the most outstanding seasons in League history (albeit some again blamed Malthouse, prior miracles aside).

Still, based on their time at Collingwood alone, Malthouse is well ahead. In a dozen seasons he conjured eight finals berths, six top four finishes and four Grand Finals – an enviable record in a 16-17 team competition. He also rapidly rebuilt the side a second time (and to this end Derek Hine’s recruiting genius was also a key). Besides 1990, Matthews failed to win a final in 1988-89, 1992 and 1994, plus the great hangover of 1991 earns a cross.

Tellingly, Malthouse overhauled Collingwood’s culture. Matthews tended to leave the grandiose visions to those running the club.  Collingwood and Brisbane resembled punch drunk fighters when he left, seemingly losing passion come the inevitable decline.  List management wasn’t a forte either.

‘Old Grumpy’ might have come across as decidedly hard work, yet Mick was universally loved by his charges and a different beast behind club doors.  Matthews’ directness was perhaps easier for club management but left a few aggrieved players in his wake (it’s said Lethal essentially ‘lost’ Collingwood’s players in 1993). But he’s always been a ‘winner’, and clubs are in the business of winning premierships. You can’t argue with a threepeat, nor his superior strike rate.

Not surprisingly, Malthouse and Matthews’ personalities are reflected in the overriding playing styles and philosophies over the journey.  Lethal’s best teams generally employed a fast running game utilising the corridor which saw key forwards at very least bringing down the ball front and square for the crumbers – never more evident than Akermanis’ premiership sealing snap in 2002.  With the right players on deck it was a recipe for success.  It’s no coincidence that Chris Scott’s successful tweak of Geelong’s style owed more than a little to his Brisbane learnings.

Mick’s bedrock was of course defence, although it would be remiss to dismiss the importance of exciting, skilled players to execute his game plans.  Apart from the ‘Pies, it facilitated a perfect decade of finals appearances at the Eagles after some commendable under-Dog achievements.  Malthouse also displayed a capacity to not only evolve over time, but to stay ahead of the game via well documented tactical innovations.  And the recent procession of assistants to find senior jobs is another feather in his cap.

Perhaps the decision would ultimately come down to this. Is the club traveling well and/or in a position to go all the way? If yes, then Matthews will take you there.

Is the club struggling and/or building a list? If yes, then Malthouse will turn things around in a jiffy.

Am I still sitting on the fence? Afraid so!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Pigskin Ponderings